3 Comments

Hi Sam, I've been reading your articles and really enjoying them! What is your evaluation of the idea that a child's most important need is for 'belonging and significance' and that all misbehaviours come from a mistaken effort to fulfil those particular needs? I have not found that to be a true or helpful premise to hold while working with my kids. That is one of the reasons why I chose P.E.T. instead of Positive Discipline when I was looking for a certification to pursue. P.E.T. teaches techniques to help the child tell you in his own words (or actions, if pre-verbal) what is actually wrong, so you don't need to make any assumptions. And of course it is also a non-punitive approach. I would

love to read a comparison between those like the one you did between RIE and Montessori!

Expand full comment
author

Hi Heather! Thank you so much for the feedback, I'm glad you're enjoying them!

As of right now, I find the claim that belonging and significance is the primary desire of all people dubious at best. I agree more broadly, though, that a person's ideas drive their actions and that the vast majority of a *young* child's 'misbehavior' (~0-6) stems from unmet needs.

Thanks for the recommendation! I've heard great things about P.E.T. and I'm planning on doing a series on it soon (maybe next?) I think doing a comparison would be really fun and helpful as well, especially if I find some really key ideas that a lot of differences between them turn on.

Expand full comment

Great article, Sam, very insightful (which is more than you can say for any of mine!)

Expand full comment